I have nothing other than personal lock-in (nexus 5) to Qi. that being said, I don't know if there are any phones that have powermat integrated, does anyone know of any?
I'm in the UK and the time on the chart seems to be displayed in UTC (which isn't even the timezone I'm in right now). The time shown starts at 10:15am when it should be starting at 5:15am according to the legend:
>Service starts at 5AM on Mondaymorning. Each line represents thepath of one train. >Time continuesdownward, so steeper lines indicateslower trains.
Has anyone else noticed this issue? (Arch Linux, Chrome: 35.0.1916.114)
That's a +1 from me, I'd love an open-source version for self-hosting. I'd additionally be happy to pay for the "licence to self host" or something silly like that as long as I can see the code somehow (which is a big deal for me).
You're right, same with edit-with-emacs on chrome. Shame, the editor looks nice but I definitely wouldn't want to give up my own editor functions for it.
> Anyone who is concerned about security shouldn't be giving their password to a 3rd party to verify [even via a javascript webpage] for any reason.
I'd agree but I don't think anyone who reads hacker news is likely to use a password checker anyway. We all, however, know less technical people who could and would get compromised by something like this and to have it endorsed by the government sends the message that it is safe. That's the problem as far as I'm concerned.
I've got to say I've got a definite softspot for DuckDuckGo, but I always struggle to see bing as a contender. Now it might be for the reasons you mention (Microsoft not giving it enough TLC) but it does make it difficult to switch.
That being said I make sure that DuckDuckGo is always one keypress away, I still haven't managed to make it to a full switch but I try and use it more and more.
I was just looking at the rubymotion licences [0]. does anyone know if you will get future releases with the licence? do you only get them for one year?
I appreciate the clearly marked "Appeal to authority" as it is both relevant information and clearly marked as to it's (unintended I assume) auxiliary consequences. Very classy move, will be copying it in future.
I don't really think your comment makes sense, if you and I are juggling balls and suddenly you throw up your hands and shout "I can't take any more balls" do you think I should pick up more balls and throw them at your face or should I leave them on the ground (which in this analogy would be level 3 dropping the packets)
What do you mean when you say, "Throwing their hands up"? Are you saying the ISPs are refusing to route any traffic after a certain threshold? Does Level3 get cut off entirely if it exceeds its bandwidth limit?
They effectively are refusing to route after a certain threshold. Their connections are saturated and they aren't wanting to play ball the way other peers have (at least per Level 3's side of the story). So once their X Gigabit link is saturated, quality goes down. They don't want to use the same arrangement that Level 3 has made with others (with respect to cost distribution) to upgrade the connection so the situation remains.
