Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nullc's commentslogin

The paternalistic attitude and historical approach to fictional concerns combined with indifference to actual harms is consistent with the creators of the product. Use a different product.

I'm getting fed up with the internet due to second-hand claude exposure and its constant gaslighting. I boggle at voluntarily choosing to expose yourself to it! :P


Winner winner. Every piece of data a state forcefully collects and retains should be strictly necessary for an important function and balanced carefully against worst case misuse.

Do you think the only, or even primary, thing that determines if a person is marginalized is the color of their skin? -- even taking that you're talking about a POOR neighborhood as a prior?

> but what I think is much more likely

My mind went straight to using the AI to write a statement and the AI made stuff up, which would be a nearly guaranteed outcome from using existing LLMs for that task, and it's exactly the sort of thing that I'm sure many officers are doing ... and it could go a fair time before it was discovered.


I wish the torrent would come before the announcement. Doing it the other way is playing with fire.

> In my ideal the state should have visibility into the shape of the people present so that we can make good decisions about our combined organization.

That ideal became tantamount to enabling genocide when the US government breached the confidentiality of the census in order to prison camp the japanese on the basis of their race.

> I understand why people decide to diminish all state capacity

It's not even just a question of "all". The state should have the absolute minimum capacity to carry out its necessary tasks. Collecting race (just to give one example of many) of any form is not absolutely necessary and so it should not be done.

> they feel that governments are populated by their opponents who will use state capacity against them

Because they may be in the future. -- but even that is too strong, the greatest harm perpetrated by state actors has consistently come from trying to "help" rather than intentionally malicious acts.


Replying to a dead comment that demanded an example, for example, Mao's mass killing of somewhere on the order of 30-40 million people famine (in addition to the million straight up murdered in the cultural revolution) created as a result of "helping" through planned economy food distribution and the Eliminate Sparrows Campaign.

People only kill at a truly massive scale because they believe they are doing something good or at least necessary (even in war, but especially outside of war). This is why hoping states aren't evil isn't sufficient-- in fact it may induce mass murder, because what could be less evil than to Do the Right thing.

The universal cure is to distribute power and influence in as many ways as practicable, such that the damage from erroneous thinking is contained.


Counter point: Government inaction and easily cause deaths at a similar scale, and some types of things only really work with large scale collective action

I don't agree. When governments aren't stopping people or diverting resources, people can always organize themselves to solve problems... and in practice they do. The existence of states is in many senses the formalization of that.

My comment wasn't intended to be generally anti-government but strongly minimal government. If there is an important thing that requires more government then we should have it-- but we should always be aware of the costs and risks and minimize and diversify where possible.


It's hardly even that-- he dumped the remaining customer assets to briefly crash the price of Bitcoin... causing an understatement in what he took from people.

RMS will happily tell you that he'd trade enforcability of the GPL for the non-existence of copyright.

> RMS will happily tell you that he'd trade enforcability of the GPL for the non-existence of copyright.

Thankfully, RMS is not my guru.

Copyright is a valuable legal technology. It should be reformed to curb abuses, but we shouldn't throw the baby out with the bathwater.


Some of them believe they are building God, and if they can get there first with their God, they can build it in their image and commandeer the free choice of the rest of humanity by force to ensure there will be no God but their God.

I wish I was kidding. At least that faction is less harmful than the ones who want to use murder to stop AI research.


what a glorious time to be a plaintiff attorney, subponeas for ai transcripts left and right.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: