yeah the third item on your list is what drove me here to complain. how do you expect me to read any text on your site when it moves up or down approx. an inch every second?

They did credit it back to him. There's a comment in the linked issue.

Where? Just searched the entire thread for both the word "refund" and the word "credit" and I'm seeing nothing about credit being issued.

Also what's with @sasha-id talking to himself? Looks weird as all get out.

Looks like he copy pasted responses he got from their support agents.

See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47954655

Where? All I see is Boris saying "we are unable to issue compensation for degraded service or technical errors that result in incorrect billing routing".

Keep this in mind next time you hear someone talking about "removing the human in the loop".

Anthropic apparently won't take responsibility for issues their own systems handling billing cause. You think they'll take responsibility in your system when a bug in their models can be demonstrated as the cause?

> Anthropic apparently won't take responsibility for issues their own systems handling billing cause.

I think with every org, especially the big ones, trying to dodge responsibility (setting the intent of "customer support" to be annoying them enough for them to buzz off), the only recourse people have is to give them enough bad press where they wake up and do the refund, it's less than a rounding error for them.

I think Anthropic is hardly unique in that position and being able to chat with a human with any sort of power to actually make things right is becoming more and more rare. If any human eyes saw that, the correct thing to do would probably be passing the message up the chain like "Hey, this will have really bad optics if we don't do the right thing. Can you take like 5 minutes and hit the refund button while I draft up a nice message about it?"

Bad press is meaningless where it matters most these days. The kind of people who are most responsive to threats of bad press are the kind of people who don't need to be threatened with bad press to do the right thing.

I really wish it carried any weight. It just doesn't. If someone at the organization just says "never admit fault, always attack", it's very likely they'll get away with it.

> You think they'll take responsibility in your system when a bug in their models can be demonstrated as the cause?

Flag on the play: AI doesn’t replace responsibility for your commits.

It doesn’t matter what promises a service makes, what you say is valid code is still on you.

Act accordingly.

The issue is less what's in your commit and more if you're using these models as a foundation for some other service.

I know this is a rather hackneyed example, but if a customer service agent model were to call a customer a racial slur, that's not the software surrounding the agent, it's the agent's model.

Even if it writes the same or even somewhat worse rust than python, assuming the output is the same you are likely to get a speedup + a better distribution story.

Weird! This went from the home page to completely gone from the list in the time it took me to read a few paragraphs of the article...

I noticed this as well, presumably nuked from orbit by a hoard of Superbox

Check out the docs! They show you how to do exactly that: https://docs.helix-editor.com/remapping.html#minor-modes

Yeah, the docs show different keys combination, like `jk` or `jh` etc (even with the bug described in the issue). You can't use the same key like I am used to (just `jj`), because there is no timeout between characters.

This is unfortunately exactly why I never used (neo)vim or kakoune (or tbh, sublime text whose lsp integration I have never successfully gotten working). Going from school (Java + NetBeans/C# + Visual Studio) to work (C#/JS + Visual Studio -> C#/TS Visual Studio Code) I had expectations for certain language features being available by default. Helix is the first editor of its ilk to get configuration out of my way so I can effectively write code the way I'm used to.

Why would that happen? Participating large businesses are completely fine with the existing practice. Sure, someone can bid on your trademark, but you can also bid on theirs and probably don't want to lose that ability.

Fortunately laws aren’t limited to be exclusive to large business interests and, at least occasionally, can be drafted with intent to benefit consumers in a market.

Yeah it sounds more like a reference to the OpenAI logo to me

The author is clearly not talking about left-pad like that library is still specifically an issue. He's raising it up as an example of a problem that is still occurring. He then makes the point that maybe we should have less packaged JS code in general and that more software solutions should exist (and should have always existed) as part of the standard library or well-maintained packages like Lodash (although he doesn't reference it by name, just the concept it exemplifies). It feels like you've missed the forest for the trees.

Isn’t this already (slowly) happening?

Someone else mentioned evil-helix if you really want those keybindings but, admittedly, I think the different keybindings (and more specifically the select then operate model) are a major point of why helix (and its inspiration, kakoune) exists.