Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The specific patch the FBI is asking for is a way to be able to run a mechanized brute force attack on the pin for the phone without triggering the auto-erase.

This would require a new OS to be installed in a way that bypasses what I imagine are merely software blocks to installing OSes (it sounds like if they have possession of the device, they can install the OS to it).

This is a technique and a technique can certainly be replicated. Only problem is next time, Apple can't say, "this is an unprecedented step, and very burden-some," which actually turns out to be a legal basis.



If the government has legitimate warrants that stand up in court, then why shouldn't Apple be doing this on an individual basis?


Because a decision was passed in 1977 that said an uninvolved 3rd party can't be compelled to aide police. It's mentioned in TFA


Why would Apple not voluntarily comply? They should not need to be compelled here. They should be eager to assisting this investigation.

This isn't them taking a stand in some sort of NSA spying case, as much as Apple fanboys seem to think that's what's happening here. They're refusing to lift a finger in an investigation of mass murder.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: