Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Because it is important that everyone understand that SSL is dead and TLS is the replacement. SSL/TLS is forgivable, saying SSL is sort of like writing a headline “How this company uses VHS” when you actually meant Betamax. It’s misleading.


I still don't get it. This is clarified in the very first sentence of TFA. Why do you think it needs to be stuffed into the title?


We wouldn't need to have this conversation if the title said TLS.


You're correct, but you're fighting an uphill battle: https://certsimple.com/blog/ssl-or-tls


When talking to management, I try to avoid the acronyms (SSL, TLS, HTTPS, etc.), and in this case, I've coined a phrase that I find be equally understood by management, devops, and sysadmins alike. I tell them that we need to "encrypt server X with a secure certificate" (or "secure cert" depending who I'm talking to, which is as short as the shortest acronym syllable-wise). It's vague enough to cover the spectrum of acronyms in a timeless (for the foreseeable future) way, but unambiguous enough that everyone understands.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: