So you're saying that allowing direct election of Senators in a State shifts the likelihood of getting a National Representative for a State that is unduly favored toward the State's urban population centers rather than looking out for both the low and high density centers equally?
Whereas if the State Senate was still responsible for nominating Senators, equal representation across the State would be achieved?
Whereas if the State Senate was still responsible for nominating Senators, equal representation across the State would be achieved?
Or am I still being dense?