Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A couple of years ago, Cloudflare refused to remove access to ISIS websites, and said it's not the job of ISPs or themselves to police content.

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/anonymous-opisis-cloudflare-refuse...



The policy of one internet infrastructure firm doesn't validate the original claim of ISIS' online activity being 'ignored for well over a decade.'


It does imply they take it less seriously than stormfront, though.


Do you mean Cloudfront? I suppose so, but I don't know enough about the company to reach a firm conclusion.


No, stormfront was a ... racially charged... website that Cloudflare actually did refuse to host.


I meant to say Cloudflare, sorry. I know what Stormfront is.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: