Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The figure of 264GB doesn’t really tell us much, it would be more informative if they shared the # of people affected.


if we can assume its mostly text data, then it speaks a bit to the scope.


It might be full of those scanned PDFs that are 100 MB each.


Therefore 2640 people? That's a lot of people.


264GB in client profile pictures perhaps, that would be a lot of people affected!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: