What I find very interesting specifically with the case you describe here is that this is directly opposite to Section 230. Where tech companies have terms and moderation and rules on what people can do on their platforms which they enforce as they see fit for profit purposes... but then turn around and claim immunity for responsibility for any illegal actions that take place within those platforms.
I think such a dichotomy is a strange accident that technology companies have been all the more happy to allow to exist. Personally, I think this kind of construction gives them far too much power over their platform.
