> However, the judge seemed rather unconvinced that a market definition consisting of only iOS devices was actually the correct market to analyze... As an aside, I've read a number of comments here lamenting that the judge doesn't understand tech, but I think the opposite is true as well: many of the commenters here don't understand the law.

I mean this is probably a good case of "the law doesn't understand the law" in that the law does not have a particularly useful definition of what constitutes a "market"