Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Serious question - How does that make it legitimate? In our eyes (the viewers) or twitter's terms&cond?


Twitter allows all sorts of garbage claims about Trump from mainstream media sources which simply cite "anonymous sources". Most recently the NYTimes claimed to have Trumps tax returns - without evidence verifying the authenticity. Over the last few years, Russiagate relied almost entirely on "anonymous sources" - and we all know how that turned out.


> and we all know how that turned out.

With a bunch of Trump campaign and administration officials admitting in federal court to collaborating with Russian government?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Links_between_Trump_associates...


[flagged]


The conclusion of the investigation was that it wasn't reasonable to indict a sitting President not that nothing illegal happened. In fact, the wording danced right up to the fact that something illegal did happen but the President can't be charged while in office.


[flagged]


Funny, the left says the same thing about the right being in denial about supporting a morally corrupt president.


[flagged]


- Porn star payoffs

- Tax fraud

- Admissions of sexual assault on tape

- Tax fraud

- Credible allegations of rape or sexual misconduct (26)

- Lying to the American public about the threat of covid (on tape)

What do you want to call it?


[flagged]


It bums me out that we live in such completely different worlds.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: