Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The title. If they reduced the build time by that much, then at least that much of the build time must have been spent downloading code.

If the title is a lie (which it probably is), then nevermind that number, but it's clear where it came from.



The text of the article clearly states that clone time was reduced by 99%.

The only way build time could have been reduced by 99% is if every part of the build other than cloning is negligible. It is far more plausible to assume that the title is simply wrong.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: