> the anti-CoC crowd might jump on this as an example of problems with codes of conduct more generally, or might point at this as part of “cancel culture” (a concept I vehemently disagree with, since what is referred to as “cancellation” is often just “facing consequences”).
This is an amazing example of cognitive dissonance. The guy gets cancelled for basically nothing by a self appointed jury, which is exactly what is referred to when talking about cancel culture, and will still disagree about the concept. Maybe he thinks he's the only one being wrongly accused? Or maybe he considers himself "facing consequences" too?
This is an amazing example of cognitive dissonance. The guy gets cancelled for basically nothing by a self appointed jury, which is exactly what is referred to when talking about cancel culture, and will still disagree about the concept. Maybe he thinks he's the only one being wrongly accused? Or maybe he considers himself "facing consequences" too?