Author here. Using ASC was intentional, _because_ it is somewhat immature, and s... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		dassurma on April 14, 2021 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Is WebAssembly magic performance pixie dust? Author here. Using ASC was intentional, _because_ it is somewhat immature, and still manages to outperform JavaScript in the first two cases. In the third case, where I couldn’t get ASC to outperform JavaScript, I tried Rust and C++ as well.

CyberDildonics on April 14, 2021 [–]

That seems to mean every bit of your title is nonsense. You aren't benchmarking webasm at its best and 'magic pixie dust' is already nonsense on its own.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact