> I want to be very clear: Any generalized, quantitative take-away from this article would be ill-advised.
I don't think WASM and JS are "just as fast"--the author only did a couple of microbenchmarks. There are almost certainly many cases in which WASM would outperform JS, but they probably aren't going to be tight loops over an array or similar.
> I want to be very clear: Any generalized, quantitative take-away from this article would be ill-advised.
I don't think WASM and JS are "just as fast"--the author only did a couple of microbenchmarks. There are almost certainly many cases in which WASM would outperform JS, but they probably aren't going to be tight loops over an array or similar.