Wormhole.app and magic-wormhole have different goals.
Wormhole.app works in the browser, which means that it provides usable security to normal people. No `pip install` or command line needed. Wormhole.app stores end-to-end encrypted files for 24 hours so the share link continues to work even after the sender closes the tab or powers off their device.
This is a confusing name choice, since the real Magic Wormhole --- whose command is literally "wormhole" --- is vetted and widely used, and this new "Wormhole.app" is not. I'd consider changing it, since you're going to get this response any time you talk about Feross Wormhole among clueful types, and the comparison (right now at least) isn't very favorable to you. At best, it suggests you're not familiar with Magic Wormhole, which would be a strange credential for someone trying to do a new secure file transfer system.
It sounds like you're suggesting that magic-wormhole only wishes to provide end-to-end encryption to "abnormal" people. I don't believe that's true and there already exist implementations of the open magic-wormhole protocol in several languages.
The original magic-wormhole project is at least 6 years old. How did you determine its goals?
FWIW, I agree with other comments that you've chosen a confusingly-similar name (and that's unfortunate).
I was very excited to check this out, as I imagined `Wormhole.app` was a MacOS package for `magic-wormhole`, but, alas, it's just a web app with a very similar name.
We're planning to introduce a Pro plan for larger file limits and explore an enterprise version for organizations that have high security requirements (law firms, etc.) that can't use existing cloud storage providers.
Wormhole.app works in the browser, which means that it provides usable security to normal people. No `pip install` or command line needed. Wormhole.app stores end-to-end encrypted files for 24 hours so the share link continues to work even after the sender closes the tab or powers off their device.