Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If they were conservatively minded or playing it safe, the highest probability is that they left or lost a long time ago, or they haven’t entered yet. Coinbase won, effectively, which means they are well beyond taking a cut of transactions and calling it good.

The statement from the CEO is to prevent a run. Why do they need to prevent a run if they aren’t farming the float?

The only other option is “we make our money on trades” however, and especially in the bigger coins, trades are expensive, and not happening as often as they would like. They would (and will, if it comes to light) likely argue that it would be violation of their fiduciary duty to allow the custodial accounts to just sit there not making money.

If exchange revenue data are public this could probably be figured out based on comparing transaction flow and revenue. My money is they are dependent on float, and probably also directly or indirectly using it to front-run. It is SOP for finance.



> The statement from the CEO is to prevent a run. Why do they need to prevent a run if they aren’t farming the float?

Users/holdings going down aren't good for the company and stock, even if a run doesn't hurt them financially.

Coinbase claims not to do anything with deposits: https://help.coinbase.com/en/coinbase/privacy-and-security/o...


I’m getting a gateway error on your link.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: