Education and resources for things to that end are potentially being directed and filtered by and through a self-perpetuating "bureaucracy of thought" product and marketers, which, allegedly, demands strict adherence and conformity with their dogma, beliefs, and potentially facts if some topics are taboo.

The article & discussion is relevant to hackernews in many respects: subversion is often construed with hacking. education and hacking.

If you believe the topic taboo, then your taboo is being 'hacked'.

I concede that the primary goal is likely to foster discussion of individuals found on hackernews opposed to inform the hackernews audience, though it's not without merit either way.

It directly relates to many of the institutions that employ and educate those in our profession, which directly effects the experience of individuals in these institutions.

None. I flagged this post immediately because I knew what the comments section would turn into. I was right.

Typical authoritarian behavior. Can't handle discourse, so you run to the authorities to censor your opponents.

Brand new accounts throwing accusations like this are not exactly helping the conversation, are they?

Are you a regular here? Why not use your usual account, if so?

He's absolutely and undeniably right, though.

There is no meaningful discourse here. That’s my point.

Hacker culture was incubated in universities. Some of it still thrives there.