Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're not wrong, but having an incredibly important dependence on an industry 100 miles off the coast of China (and the target of their increasingly erratic dictator) is worth paying billions to break.


Well it's a bit like how I see universal healthcare. Would it be worth paying billions for? Oh absolutely. Do I believe the current US Gov could actually take all the money in the world and make it happen in a way I'd be happy with? LOL.


This short-termism seems like it's been America's chief problem through the centuries.

"We need slavery - our economy will fall apart without it!"

"We need Standard Oil and US Steel - splitting them apart would be a catastrophe!"

"We need universal healthcare - a public option would place undue burden on insurance companies!"

"We need Boeing - our foreign competitors would eat us up otherwise!"

At some point, it's time to admit that the long-term pain is not worth the short-term benefits we get from naive economic policies.


1 - not short-termism

2 - comparing a minor economic investment ($8B on a $23T gdp) to slavery, and the economic system built on slavery, is the stupidest thing I've read this week, so, well, congrats. I guess?

3 - not a naive economic policy; US government investment built silicon valley and that's going ok.


Try being a green badge at Intel and then get back to me




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: