Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> There’s also part of, good designs don’t depend on high precision components. I think TAoE emphasized that.

If I call correctly, TAoE said engineering calculations should never keep too many significant digits, since no real-world components are that accurate, and all good designs should keep component tolerance in mind - they should not have an unrealistic expectation of precision. It also mentioned that designing a circuit for absolute worst-case tolerance is often a waste of time.

But I don't think TAoE told you to "avoid precision components in your design, use trimmers instead" (Do you have a page number?) when the application calls for it. For example, 0.1% feedback resistors in precision voltage references are often reasonable.

> For high precision one can use trim potentiometers

From what I've read (from other sources), mechanical trimmer used to be extremely popular, but they went out of favor in recent decades because tuning could not be automated and that increased assembly cost. Using a 0.1% resistor is favorable if it allows trim-free production.

> or maybe even digital potentiometer with an ADC at the other side to measure and get as close as possible

Yes, digital trimming and calibrations is today's go-to solution.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: