I'm torn on this. At large, I'm rather against legacy admissions. I'm also against regulations that are not necessarily results oriented. To that end, incentives for education facilities should probably be more oriented to testing or positive research?

This is like parents that get upset with kids for having a mess in their rooms. Which, I mean, sure? Seems a bit more appropriate to pay attention to school grades and such, than whether or not the kid is getting to sleep in a spotless room by bedtime every single night.

Granted, if the grades are already hopeless, it can make sense to start with more attainable goals to start. Is that the general idea here?