Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> doing further damage to the creative commons

Not sure I understand this part. Because creators would be getting paid for their works being used for someone else’s commercial gain?



Because it reinforces the idea that creative works should usually involve lawyers.


No it doesn’t. It reinforces that copyright is the law. If you don’t violate someone’s copyright, you don’t need a lawyer.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: