Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Eh, releases are arbitrary points in the development cycle. There is new, stable, stuff in the dev trunk today, we just don't get to see it.

I don't see any difference between Google code-dumping (because that's all they do) "releases" of Android and iD Software open-sourcing old versions of idTech. iD is just more honest about it.



An open source project only requires that you can see the code, not that you can see what any one person or team is working on at any given moment.

Calling Google dishonest for making the latest released version of Android available seems disingenuous, at best.


If you remove the community-based aspect from open source, there is not much of an advantage in it. This idea of regular code-drops seem just like a way of maintaining the minimum requirements to conform to the open source tag.


In fact, many of the FSF's own open source projects had closed-off development processes from the start with only periodic source drops available.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: