Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's an interesting take. You didn't want to bother with running a local Temporal, but you are happy to engineer it yourself in Postgres?
 help



We already have a Postgres instance running (as I'm sure most stacks have), so it's just another database table rather than a whole new piece of infrastructure that needs to be maintained, with its associated cost, attack surface, risk of Temporal going under or dropping support for OSS, authentication, and other unknowns.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: