Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Imagine not wanting to own a piece of the first company to make a re-usable orbital class booster.

They didn't say they didn't want to own it, they said they wanted to own it at a : "90% discount after the IPO and the next tech / AI correction."

It is possible for a company to be both technically impressive and horrifically overvalued.

 help



I think it's undervalued.

Have you looked at the S1? The valuation is not based on launchers, it's based on all the potential money they can make as an AI company. Given that they are probably not even in the top 10 in that business, it's just pie in the sky.

Welp, if enough people think like the other fella, line will go up and money will be made

Something about finding out who's swimming naked once the tide goes out


Great, you have an opportunity to make bank, then, no?

If Musk thought that, why would he need to have all the rules changed?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: