Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I wish you'd use LangPop.com for stats instead of TIOBE:-) I agree about the marketing/communication aspect of things though: I was under some sort of impression that 1.9 was, like "odd numbered Linux kernels" some sort of permanent-beta. I'm not quite sure where I got that idea, but a few other people I know seemed to be under the same impression. Something else that might help is a prominently located guide/tutorial to upgrading to 1.9.


I believe that 1.9 was supposed to be a beta (1.5 and 1.7 were), but the plans for 2.0 got to be too ambitious and there came a need for a version number between 1.8 and 2.0. I suppose it could have been called 1.10 but there were presumably good reasons.


> I suppose it could have been called 1.10 but there were > presumably good reasons.

If I remember correctly, that's due to the way ruby sorts strings

  ['1.8','1.9','1.10'].sort  #=> ["1.10", "1.8", "1.9"]


Ah. Maybe it should have been done in hex?

  %w[1.8 1.9 1.A].sort  #=> ["1.8", "1.9", "1.A"]


Good point about LangPop, David. I will reference it in future posts.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: