You're awfully close to a No true Scotsman argument, there. However, if you're interested in damaging photos that aren't secret, you need but take a look at the history of social news. There have been a number of high-profile false allegations with associated vigilantism.
I'm nowhere near that fallacy. I am specifically looking for examples to the claim that I questioned (the single example provided to me thus far actually supports exactly what I said).
That the crowd can be stupid (as in the recent Reddit Boston bombing nonsense) has absolutely no relevance to this.
So what you're looking for is
1) a photo
2) not depicting a secret
3) publicized unintentionally
4) that ruined a life or relationship
5) without involving mass misunderstanding
Sorry, I can't provide one for you. The documentation on such events is typically kept to a small circulation.
