Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think James Cameron is talking about 60 FPS.


James Cameron said in November 2012, on his possible usage of 48 FPS:

“If there is acceptance of 48 [FPS], then that will pave the way for Avatar (sequels) to take advantage of it.”

http://latino-review.com/2012/11/james-cameron-talks-avatar-...

There are going to be 3 Avatar sequels:

http://variety.com/2013/film/news/avatar-to-get-three-sequel...

Time enough to iron out any issues with HFR (high frame rate). 48 OR 60.


> Some of the word behind the scenes in the SMPTE world this summer is that 60fps could be too much of a gamble and Avatar will go out in 48fps. No one will say this publicly, and Cameron and team are still hyping 60fps in general while not committing to anything. But there are fears that if shot at 60fps, there’s no clean way to play the movie at 24fps in some theaters– an easier transition for 48fps but even untested in 48 given that that issue helped derail the move to SMPTE DCP for The Hobbit release. And fear that current playback gear can’t do 450Mb/s at 60fps. Gear manufacturers say they can do 500Mb/s, but the studios in reality have to settle for less, due to the bit-rate bottlenecks in various systems.”

Never thought about that but yes it makes sense that the conversion from 48fps to 24fps is easy whereas the one from 60fps to 24fps seems impossible or cumbersome. If this is delaying the 60fps age, then I'm really sad about it :(


My guess is it would be something like the well-worn 3-2 pull down; you could get there, but the loss in quality is annoying.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-two_pull_down




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: