Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In addition to sspiff's good info, take a look at the I/O options:

https://www.96boards.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/HiKey_Us...

This will likely limit how useful the board can be, because the I/O choices will prevent a good ecosystem from growing up around it.



Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this true for all popular ARM boards today? Decent CPU, low power consumption, and terrible I/O performance?

I remember the PandaBoard as exceptionally bad, most are better but still pretty slow.


Take a look at the BeagleBone Black. It has pretty decent I/O. The big gaping missing piece, of course, is better video output, but that's sort of in the same bucket as open source GPUs: missing in action.


I actually have one on my desk, waiting to be used. Hoping to play around with OpenBSD on it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: